XAP Task 1 Essays - Medicine, Health, RTT, Vaccines,

XAP Task 1 XAP Task 1 A1. Nursing Article Friedl, A. A., Aegerter, C. C., Saner, E. E., Meier, D. D., Beer, J. J. (2012). An intensive 5-year-long influenza vaccination campaign is effective among doctors but not nurses. Infection, 40(1), 57-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21956456 Table: Background/ Introduction This article was written to inspire healthcare staff in different hospital settings to accept vaccinations as provided. The plan was to educate doctors and nurses and make vaccines available over a five-year period aimed at the importance of receiving the vaccines. The individuals who accepted vaccination were closely watched throughout the process. The data was collected at a teaching hospital between 2003 and 2007; follow-up data was provided from the time between 2008 and 2009. Two threats to the study were identified during the flu seasons of 2005 and 2009 with the outbreaks of the Avian Influenza and the H1N1 strands. Due to these outbreaks, an increase in vaccinations was seen amongst nurses and doctors, with doctors being the most accepting of vaccination during these periods. Review of the Literature Several trustworthy references are indicated providing statistical evidence for the years indicated in the study. The risks of not accepting the influenza vaccine and the benefits for acceptance are shown with adequate portrayal of the evidenced problem. No evidence of further evaluation from the author after the introduction was found; neither was it portrayed after the methodology. The article discussed research gathered from 2003 to 2009. Discussion of Methodology The information collected depicted the number of doctors and nurses who accepted the vaccination and who refused it , and the reason for each decision. Data Analysis Quantitative studies are accomplished by gathering numerical data, typically statistical, and reviewing the information. At the commencement of the study, the focus of the research was quantitative in nature but eventually proceeded to consist of the correlation and analysis of the information with the success of the interventions used related to the influenza occurrences within the years of the study. It was then shown that with the continuation of this study, the data showed whom within the study agreed to receive vaccination more, nurses or physicians, and, lastly, assessed the nurses' explanations for no response. Researcher's Conclusion When going over the data after the study was complete, it was concluded that: the acceptance of the vaccine did not significantly correlate to any certain interventions. But, a greater rate of acceptance did occur within the years of the two influenza outbreaks were rampant. It was shown with this study that the doctors accepted the vaccine more with interventions than did the nurses. It was evident that the methodology behind this study was accurate, a flaw in the planning process pronounced itself. This experiment was originally designed to present totality of doctors and nurses accepting the vaccine at this certain facility, however, was never taken into account those who received the vaccine at a different location. It was shown that the number one reason for rejection was because the nurse/ doctor did not want to get ill related to the vaccine. In reverse, the number one reason given for acceptance was to avoid becoming very ill, especially during the specific influenza outbreaks which had occurred during this study. A2. Analysis It is my conclusion that the study showed accuracy with the presentation of the data. The evidence collected within the five years was supported by referencing additional studies which were similar conducted in Europe. After reviewing the data collected in this study, it is concluded that the researchers whom conducted it portrayed accuracy when presenting their data. Not only was the evidence supported in this study, the researchers also made reference to similar studies conducted in Europe. Although the intentions of this study was to analyze the rate of vaccinations related to interventions, a secondary deduction has been brought forth relating to the factors of motivation to receive or deny vaccinations, and, also, ease to compare the rates to accept. Although the omission of the percent of individuals who received vaccinations elsewhere likely altered the results, the correlation amongst other similar studies throughout the region were astounding and supportive. The data collected, unfortunately, does not support the hypothesis of the researchers,